Both are assumed to be 'victims of commercial sexual exploitation'. Then you could reference the ten-level scale used in the UK, the relevant parts of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and the UN Protocol on Child Prostitution and Pornography - noting that the two are lumped together, and that a 'child' is defined in international law as anybody aged under 18, with no distinction between a 17-year-old and a 7-year-old who pose topless in front of a camera. OK, I wouldn't really include the 'Trust me, I'm a shrink' that was just a bit of fun. Judith Levine) that in the USA and UK the legal limits are unclear and dependent on the highly subjective interpretation of judges and juries, in which massive influence wielded by expert witnesses is almost never contested (trust me, I'm a shrink) and these interpretations together with a host of new laws, are constantly shifting in a conservative direction at the behest of 'political correctness', certain feminist groups, children's charities such as NCH, and tabloid populism.' 'Definitions vary widely across time, cultures and national jurisdictions. On the definition of 'child pornography', for example: All of these are highly emotive and hotly contested, so how can you possibly deal with this in the factual and neutral manner of an encyclopedia? By typing: 'These issues are highly emotive and hotly contested'. Then you could identify and list the themes and topics that the LS phenomenon involves and relates to (with links to other Wiki entries which explain them in more detail). By that I mean, it's just a question of using sufficiently neutral, objective language like, 'People who claim to have viewed the material report that the models appear to enjoy posing and treat the whole exercise as a funny game' and, 'Press reports of 'child pornography' studios in Ukraine being raided by police, and the organisers being prosecuted, in 2004, are widely believed to refer to LS Studios, or to the production of material under that trademark, though this has never been confirmed by official sources'. But it seems to me that the problem with re-submitting the LS Studios article, under that title, is largely semantic. I must just be a naive Wiki-newbie and missing something obvious here because this can't have occured only to me and escaped everybody else.

Ls models